Yellow zone Onkoloji / Solid Tümörler

Prostate Cancer — The Problem of Overdiagnosis, Active Surveillance, and Correct Interpretation of PSA

What distinguishes prostate cancer from other cancers is THIS: THE MAIN ISSUE IN THIS DISEASE IS NOT ONLY LATE DIAGNOSIS, BUT ALSO OVERDIAGNOSIS AND OVERTREATMENT.

A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF PROSTATE CANCERS PROGRESSES SO SLOWLY THAT THE PATIENT DIES OF ANOTHER CAUSE; in these patients, TREATMENT DOES NOT EXTEND LIFE EXPECTANCY, but causes PERMANENT SIDE EFFECTS such as URINARY INCONTINENCE and SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION. FOR THIS REASON, TWO CONCEPTS MUST BE LEARNED.

The first is that PSA SCREENING IS NOT AN AUTOMATIC TEST: screening REQUIRES SHARED DECISION-MAKING, and the PATIENT'S AGE and EXPECTED LIFE EXPECTANCY are decisive; screening DOES NOT BENEFIT patients with LIMITED LIFE EXPECTANCY, but INITIATES A CHAIN OF HARM. The second is ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE: for LOW-RISK disease, ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE IS A VALID OPTION and THIS IS NOT 'LEAVING UNTREATED' — it is an EFFECTIVE MONITORING PROGRAM that includes PLANNED MEASUREMENTS, IMAGING, and REPEATED TISSUE SAMPLING, and TREATMENT IS INITIATED IF THE DISEASE PROGRESSES.

IF THESE TWO CONCEPTS ARE NOT EXPLAINED TO THE PATIENT, THE PATIENT REMAINS WITH THE FEELING 'I HAVE CANCER but I AM NOT BEING TREATED'. The NON-CANCEROUS CAUSES OF PSA ELEVATION must also be known.

ALL DOSES and THRESHOLDS must be verified from the INSTITUTIONAL PROTOCOL.

Rapid management

  • THE MAIN PROBLEM IN THIS DISEASE IS NOT ONLY LATE DIAGNOSIS, BUT ALSO OVERDIAGNOSIS AND OVERTREATMENT:
  • A SIGNIFICANT PROPORTION OF PROSTATE CANCERS PROGRESS SO SLOWLY THAT THE PATIENT DIES FOR ANOTHER REASON; in these patients, treatment DOES NOT PROLONG LIFE but leaves PERMANENT SIDE EFFECTS such as URINARY INCONTINENCE and SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION.
  • CONCEPT 1 — PSA SCREENING IS NOT AN AUTOMATED EXAMINATION:
  • IT requires SHARED DECISION; The PATIENT's AGE and LIFE EXPECTANCY are decisive and screening does not provide BENEFIT in patients with LIMITED LIFE EXPECTANCY, it only starts the BIOPSY, DIAGNOSIS and TREATMENT CHAIN.
  • Age and duration criteria MUST BE VERIFIED FROM THE INSTITUTIONAL PROTOCOL.
  • CONCEPT 2 — ACTIVE FOLLOW-UP:
  • IT IS A VIABLE OPTION IN LOW-RISK DISEASE AND NOT "LEAVING IT UNTREATED" — IT IS AN EFFECTIVE PROGRAM THAT INCLUDES PLANNED PSA MEASUREMENT, IMAGING and REPEATED TISSUE SAMPLING; IF PROGRESS IS DETECTED, TREATMENT IS STARTED.
  • WHEN THIS IS NOT EXPLAINED, THE PATIENT REMAINS WITH THE FEELING OF "I HAVE CANCER BUT I AM NOT BEING TREATED" and DISCONNECTS FROM FOLLOW-UP or seeks UNNECESSARY TREATMENT IN ANOTHER CENTER.
  • NON-CANCEROUS CAUSES OF HIGH PSA:
  • PROSTATE ENLARGEMENT, PROSTATE INFLAMMATION (RELATED PROTOCOL), URINARY TRACT INFECTION, CATHETER AND INTERVENTIONS, BICYCLE, RECENT EJACULATION → ARE NOT DECIDED WITH A SINGLE HIGH VALUE, THE MEASUREMENT IS REPEATED UNDER APPROPRIATE CONDITIONS.
  • Also, SOME DRUGS LOWER THE PSA VALUE and may show the VALUE FALSELY SAFE.
  • WARNING:
  • BONE PAIN, BACK PAIN with NEUROLOGICAL MANIFESTATION (spinal cord compression — related protocol), INABILITY to URINATE and RENAL DYSFUNCTION.
  • BONE, METABOLIC, CARDIOVASCULAR and MENTAL EFFECTS of HORMONE SUPPRESSIVE THERAPY should be monitored.
  • FAMILY HISTORY and SPECIFIC ETHNIC ORIGINS increase the risk; GENETIC COUNSELING may come to the fore.
DrugAdultPediatricRouteDuration
THE MAIN DISTINCTION — THE PROBLEM OF OVERDIAGNOSIS AND OVERTREATMENT Understanding the problem of over-diagnosis and overtreatment is the key point that distinguishes prostate cancer from other cancers and determines all management decisions. In many other cancers, the earlier the diagnosis, the better the outcome, and this principle is indisputable. In prostate cancer, however, the situation is more complex because a significant portion of these cancers remain silent for years or even decades and do not affect the patient's life at all. It is common to find unknown prostate cancer in autopsies of older men; these individuals died of other causes, not because of their cancer. Finding and treating these cancers does not prolong the patient's life but subjects them to the lasting side effects of surgery and radiation therapy. Therefore, the decision should be based not on the presence of cancer, but on whether that cancer will harm the patient. A SIGNIFICANT PROPORTION OF PROSTATE CANCERS PROGRESS SO SLOWLY THAT THE PATIENT DIES FOR ANOTHER REASON. IN THESE PATIENTS, TREATMENT DOES NOT PROLONG LIFE, BUT LEAVES PERMANENT SIDE EFFECTS SUCH AS URINARY INCONTINENCE AND SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION. FOR THIS REASON, THE DECISION IS MADE ACCORDING TO THE QUESTION "WILL THIS CANCER HARM THIS PATIENT", NOT "IS THERE CANCER". Risk classification MUST BE VERIFIED FROM THE INSTITUTIONAL PROTOCOL Not applied — At the decision stage
CONCEPT 1 — PSA screening is a shared decision The need for a shared decision in PSA screening makes it inappropriate to add this test to routine blood tests. In practice, PSA is often added to a blood sample taken for another purpose or requested as part of a general check-up package; the patient does not know what this test means, and when the result is high, the chain has started. Each link in this chain imposes a burden on the patient: biopsy carries bleeding and infection risks; when a diagnosis is made, the patient becomes a cancer patient and bears this psychological burden; when a treatment decision is made, permanent side effects arise. However, some patients might not have wanted to start this chain from the beginning. Therefore, the test should be discussed before it is ordered, possible benefits and harms should be explained, and the patient's expected life span should be taken into account. PSA SCREENING IS NOT AN AUTOMATIC TEST; IT REQUIRES A SHARED DECISION. THE DECISIVE FACTORS ARE THE PATIENT'S AGE and EXPECTED LIFE SPAN: Screening DOES NOT PROVIDE BENEFIT in patients with LIMITED LIFE EXPECTANCY, but it INITIATES THE CHAIN OF BIOPSY, DIAGNOSIS, and TREATMENT. WHAT SHOULD BE EXPLAINED DURING THE CONSULTATION: the POSSIBLE BENEFIT of screening, the risk of OVER-DIAGNOSIS, and TREATMENT SIDE EFFECTS. Age ranges should be VERIFIED FROM INSTITUTIONAL PROTOCOL Not applied — In the screening decision
Non-cancer causes of elevated PSA Knowing the non-cancerous causes of elevated PSA prevents a significant portion of unnecessary biopsies. This marker is specific to prostate tissue but not specific to cancer; almost any condition affecting the prostate can raise the value. Benign prostatic enlargement seen with age is the most common cause. Prostatitis can cause significant elevation and the value may decrease after treatment. Urinary tract infection, catheterization, and urological interventions also raise the value. Two less known causes are cycling and recent ejaculation; therefore, there are questions that should be asked to the patient before measurement. There is also a reverse trap: some medications used for benign prostatic enlargement lower PSA values, and in these patients, the measured value appears safer than it actually is. NON-CANCEROUS CAUSES OF PSA ELEVATION: PROSTATE ENLARGEMENT, PROSTATITIS (relevant protocol), URINARY TRACT INFECTION, CATHETERIZATION and UROLOGICAL INTERVENTIONS, CYCLING, RECENT EJACULATION. DECISIONS SHOULD NOT BE MADE BASED ON A SINGLE HIGH VALUE; MEASUREMENT SHOULD BE REPEATED UNDER APPROPRIATE CONDITIONS and AT APPROPRIATE INTERVALS. ALSO, SOME PROSTATE ENLARGEMENT MEDICATIONS LOWER PSA VALUES and MAY GIVE A FALSELY SAFE VALUE; MEDICATION HISTORY SHOULD BE ASKED Not applied Laboratory In the evaluation
CONCEPT 2 — ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE is not leaving untreated Accurately explaining active surveillance to the patient directly determines the success of this option, and when explained incorrectly, the patient may abandon the program. From the patient's perspective, the situation is as follows: the patient has been diagnosed with cancer and the physician is not starting any treatment. This may be interpreted as negligence or abandonment; the patient becomes anxious, the family exerts pressure, and often seeks treatment at another center. However, active surveillance is not absence, it is a program; it includes measurement, examination, imaging, and repeated tissue sampling at specified intervals, and treatment is initiated when evidence of disease progression is detected. In other words, the patient is not left unmonitored, but rather closely observed. When this distinction is clearly communicated and the surveillance schedule is provided to the patient in writing, compliance significantly increases. ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE IS A VALID OPTION IN LOW-RISK DISEASE. ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE IS NOT 'LEAVING UNTREATED': IT IS AN EFFECTIVE PROGRAM INCLUDING PLANNED PSA MEASUREMENTS, EXAMINATION, IMAGING, and REPEATED TISSUE SAMPLING; IF PROGRESSION IS DETECTED, TREATMENT IS INITIATED. THIS SHOULD BE EXPLAINED TO THE PATIENT IN THIS MANNER. The content and intervals of surveillance should be VERIFIED FROM THE INSTITUTIONAL PROTOCOL Not applied — The reason why long-term
Risk classification determines the treatment decision The fact that risk classification determines the treatment decision is the reason why there is no single treatment approach in prostate cancer. Two patients with the same diagnosis are managed completely differently if their risk groups differ, and this difference creates confusion if it is not explained to the patient; the patient hears that another prostate cancer patient nearby underwent surgery and asks why the same was not done for them. Multiple pieces of information are used together in classification: blood marker level, how aggressive the tumor looks in tissue examination, how much of the prostate the tumor occupies, and imaging findings. In addition, the patient themselves participates in the decision; age, other diseases, and preferences regarding side effects are determinative. Therefore, the decision is based not on a single number but on the whole. THE TREATMENT DECISION is based on RISK CLASSIFICATION: PSA VALUE, GRADING IN TISSUE EXAMINATION, EXTENT OF THE TUMOR, and IMAGING FINDINGS are evaluated together. In LOW-RISK disease, ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE is considered, while in MEDIUM and HIGH-RISK disease, EFFECTIVE TREATMENT comes to the fore. THE PATIENT'S AGE, COEXISTING CONDITIONS, and PREFERENCE are included in the decision. Classification criteria MUST BE VERIFIED FROM THE INSTITUTIONAL PROTOCOL Not applied — At the decision stage
Side effect burden of hormone suppression therapy Monitoring the side effect burden of hormone-suppressive therapy is an area that determines the quality of life in these patients and is frequently neglected. The therapy works by suppressing the male hormone, and this suppression affects many systems of the body. Bone density decreases and the risk of fractures increases; this process is silent and is not detected until a fracture occurs. Body composition changes; muscle mass decreases, fat increases, and as a result, blood sugar levels can rise. Cardiovascular risk increases. Hot flashes disturb daily life, but patients may hesitate to describe them, considering them a complaint not specific to men. Loss of sexual function and psychological effects are similarly difficult topics to discuss. Therefore, side effects should be asked about directly and individually, and bone protection and exercise should be planned from the beginning. HORMONE SUPPRESSION THERAPY USED IN ADVANCED DISEASE is effective but carries a BROAD SIDE EFFECT BURDEN: REDUCTION IN BONE DENSITY and FRACTURE RISK (according to related protocol), WEIGHT GAIN and METABOLIC CHANGES, HIGH BLOOD SUGAR, CARDIOVASCULAR RISK, HOT FLASHES, LOSS OF SEXUAL FUNCTION, REDUCTION IN MUSCLE MASS, PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECTS, and COGNITIVE COMPLAINTS. THESE EFFECTS SHOULD BE MONITORED, and BONE PROTECTION and EXERCISE should be planned Not applied — Throughout the treatment
Bone metastasis and emergency presentations Timely recognition of spinal cord compression is the most critical emergency decision preventing permanent disability in prostate cancer. This cancer most frequently spreads to bone, particularly the spine; when a focus in the spine grows, it can compress the spinal cord. The insidious aspect of the process is that the first symptom is back pain, and this complaint is extremely common in this age group. When a patient presents with back pain, a mechanical cause is considered, painkillers are given, and follow-up is suggested. However, in a patient with known prostate cancer, newly onset or character-changed back pain should be approached with different urgency. When leg weakness, numbness, or urinary incontinence is added to the pain, the situation is urgent; at this stage, every hour is important because nerve damage beyond a certain point is irreversible. PROSTATE CANCER MOST COMMONLY SPREADS TO BONE. WARNING SIGNS: NEW and PERSISTENT BONE or BACK PAIN, PAIN INCREASING AT NIGHT. ADDITION OF LEG WEAKNESS, NUMBNESS, or URINARY/BOWEL INCONTINENCE TO BACK PAIN IS AN EMERGENCY REGARDING SPINAL CORD COMPRESSION AND DELAY CAN LEAD TO PERMANENT PARALYSIS (relevant protocol). IN ADDITION, URINARY RETENTION and RENAL DYSFUNCTION may develop. Not applied — In monitoring and emergency evaluation
Family history, genetic counseling, and lifestyle Bringing up family history and genetic evaluation can affect both the patient's treatment and their family's follow-up, and this connection is not sufficiently known in prostate cancer. Men with prostate cancer in their father or brother have an increased risk, and these individuals may have screening consultations at an earlier age. Beyond this, some hereditary predispositions are associated with prostate cancer and also carry risks for breast and ovarian cancer; meaning a hereditary change detected in a male patient can be significant for his sisters and daughters. This connection is often not explained to patients because a link between breast cancer and prostate cancer is not usually expected. Genetic counseling should be considered in cases of early-age, aggressive, or advanced disease. FAMILY HISTORY (prostate cancer in father or brother) and CERTAIN ETHNIC BACKGROUNDS increase risk; in these patients, SCREENING DISCUSSIONS can be initiated earlier. GENETIC COUNSELING should be considered in: EARLY AGE, AGGRESSIVE DISEASE, METASTATIC DISEASE, the presence of BREAST and OVARY CANCER in the family (relevant protocol). Criteria MUST BE VERIFIED FROM THE INSTITUTIONAL PROTOCOL. Not applied — In the evaluation

Alternative

  • Benign prostatic hyperplasia is the most common cause of PSA elevation.
  • Prostatitis can cause significant PSA elevation (relevant protocol).
  • Urinary tract infection causes temporary elevation (relevant protocols).
  • Catheterization and urological procedures can affect measurement.
  • Bladder cancer can be confused with urinary symptoms.
  • Other sources of bone metastasis must be distinguished.
  • Mechanical back pain can be confused with bone metastasis.
  • Osteoporotic fractures are part of the differential diagnosis in bone pain (relevant protocol).
  • Neurological diseases should be evaluated in cases of weakness.
  • Kidney and bladder stones should be considered in urinary symptoms.

Red flags

  • Including PSA in ROUTINE BLOOD TESTS or GENERAL CHECK-UP PACKAGES → the patient does not know WHAT THIS TEST MEANS and when the RESULTS COME HIGH, THE CHAIN HAS STARTED; each link in the chain brings BIOPSY RISK, the PSYCHOLOGICAL BURDEN of HAVING CANCER, and PERMANENT SIDE EFFECTS.
  • Screening a patient with LIMITED LIFE EXPECTANCY → DOES NOT PROVIDE BENEFIT, it only STARTS THE CHAIN OF HARM.
  • Making decisions based on a SINGLE HIGH PSA VALUE → PROSTATE ENLARGEMENT, PROSTATITIS, URINARY TRACT INFECTION, CATHETERS AND PROCEDURES, BICYCLING, and RECENT EJACULATION can raise the value; measurement SHOULD BE REPEATED UNDER APPROPRIATE CONDITIONS.
  • Not asking about MEDICATION HISTORY → some DRUGS FOR PROSTATE ENLARGEMENT LOWER PSA AND SHOW THE VALUE AS FALSELY SAFE.
  • Understanding active surveillance as 'leaving untreated' → the patient feels NEGLECTED, the FAMILY PRESSURES, and the patient SEEKS UNNECESSARY TREATMENT BY GOING TO ANOTHER CENTER; whereas active surveillance is an EFFECTIVE PROGRAM that includes PLANNED MEASUREMENT, IMAGING, and REPEATED TISSUE SAMPLING.
  • Not giving the monitoring schedule to the patient in writing → when the distinction is clearly explained and the schedule is given in writing, ADHERENCE INCREASES SIGNIFICANTLY.
  • Not explaining the risk classification to the patient → the patient hears that ANOTHER PATIENT IN THE SURROUNDINGS HAS UNDERTAKEN SURGERY and asks WHY THE SAME WAS NOT DONE FOR THEMSELVES.
  • Not monitoring BONE LOSS during HORMONE SUPPRESSIVE THERAPY → the process is SILENT and GOES UNNOTICED UNTIL A FRACTURE OCCURS.
  • Not asking about HOT FLASHES, SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION, and PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECTS → these are DIFFICULT TOPICS TO TALK ABOUT and the patient HESITATES TO MENTION THEM; they should be asked DIRECTLY and ONE BY ONE.
  • Considering new or CHANGING BACK PAIN in a KNOWN PROSTATE CANCER PATIENT as mechanical → this cancer MOST FREQUENTLY METASTASIZES TO BONE, ESPECIALLY THE SPINE.
  • Delay when LEG WEAKNESS, NUMBNESS, or URINARY/BOWEL INCONTINENCE is added to back pain → AT THIS STAGE, HOURS MATTER because NERVE DAMAGE DOES NOT RECOVER AFTER A CERTAIN POINT.
  • Skipping GENETIC COUNSELING → some hereditary predispositions ALSO CARRY RISK FOR BREAST AND OVARIAN CANCER; a change detected in a male patient may be SIGNIFICANT FOR HIS SISTER AND DAUGHTERS.

Disposition and follow-up

Green zone
Patient taken under active surveillance due to low-risk disease, given the monitoring schedule in writing, and having no complaints: planned outpatient follow-up.
Yellow zone
Patient with persistent PSA elevation on repeated measurement, requiring a biopsy decision, suspected progression during active surveillance, side effects of hormone therapy, meeting genetic counseling criteria: referral to urology and oncology.
Red zone
Back pain with leg weakness, numbness, or urinary-bowel incontinence: urgent evaluation for spinal cord compression; delay may cause permanent paralysis (relevant protocol). Inability to urinate and impaired kidney function: urgent evaluation. Fever and poor general condition (after biopsy): urgent evaluation for infection. Severe bone pain with suspicion of fracture: urgent evaluation. Signs of hypercalcemia: urgent evaluation (relevant protocol).

Key clinical points

READ FIRST — the main problem is overdiagnosis and overtreatment.

THE MAIN POINT THAT DISTINGUISHES PROSTATE CANCER FROM OTHER CANCERS AND DETERMINES ALL MANAGEMENT DECISIONS | IN MANY OTHER CANCERS, the earlier the diagnosis, the better the outcome, and this principle is indisputable | IN PROSTATE CANCER, THE SITUATION IS MORE COMPLEX: a SIGNIFICANT PORTION of these cancers remain SILENT FOR YEARS OR EVEN DECADES and DO NOT AFFECT THE PATIENT'S LIFE | It is common in autopsies of elderly men to FIND UNKNOWN PROSTATE CANCER; these individuals DIED NOT BECAUSE OF THEIR CANCER BUT FOR OTHER REASONS | DETECTING AND TREATING THESE CANCERS DOES NOT EXTEND THE PATIENT'S LIFE, but IMPOSES THE PERMANENT SIDE EFFECTS OF SURGERY AND RADIATION THERAPY: URINARY INCONTINENCE | SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION | RULE: the decision should be based not on the question 'IS THERE CANCER' but on 'WILL THIS CANCER HARM THIS PATIENT' | Risk classification SHOULD BE CONFIRMED BY INSTITUTIONAL PROTOCOL

Understanding the problem of overdiagnosis and overtreatment is the key point that distinguishes prostate cancer from other cancers. In other cancers, early diagnosis is indisputably beneficial; in prostate cancer, the situation is more complex because a significant portion of these cancers remain silent for years and do not affect the patient's life. It is common to find unknown prostate cancer in autopsies of elderly men, and these individuals died of other reasons. Treating these cancers does not extend life but imposes permanent side effects such as urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction. The decision should be based not on the presence of cancer but on whether that cancer will harm that patient.

PSA — shared decision and reasons for elevation

THE NEED FOR A SHARED DECISION FOR PSA SCREENING MAKES IT INAPPROPRIATE TO ADD THIS TEST TO ROUTINE BLOOD TESTS | IN PRACTICE, PSA is often added to a BLOOD SAMPLE TAKEN FOR ANOTHER PURPOSE or requested as PART OF A GENERAL CHECK-UP PACKAGE → the patient DOES NOT KNOW WHAT THIS TEST MEANS and WHEN THE RESULT IS HIGH, THE CHAIN STARTS | EACH LINK OF THE CHAIN ADDS A BURDEN TO THE PATIENT: BIOPSY — RISK OF BLEEDING AND INFECTION | DIAGNOSIS — the patient BECOMES A CANCER PATIENT and BEARS THIS PSYCHOLOGICAL BURDEN | TREATMENT — PERMANENT SIDE EFFECTS | HOWEVER, SOME PATIENTS MIGHT NOT HAVE WANTED THIS CHAIN FROM THE BEGINNING → the test SHOULD BE DISCUSSED BEFORE REQUESTED, POSSIBLE BENEFITS AND HARMS EXPLAINED, PATIENT'S EXPECTED LIFESPAN TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT | SCREENING DOES NOT PROVIDE BENEFIT IN patients with LIMITED LIFE EXPECTANCY | NON-CANCEROUS REASONS FOR ELEVATED PSA — knowing them PREVENTS A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF UNNECESSARY BIOPSIES: the marker IS SPECIFIC TO PROSTATE TISSUE but NOT SPECIFIC TO CANCER | BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA (most common) | PROSTATITIS (causes significant elevation; recedes after treatment) | URINARY TRACT INFECTION | CATHETER AND UROLOGICAL INTERVENTIONS | TWO LESS KNOWN REASONS: BICYCLING and RECENT EJACULATION → QUESTIONS THAT NEED TO BE ASKED BEFORE MEASUREMENT exist | REVERSE DIRECTION TRAP: SOME DRUGS USED FOR BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA LOWER PSA VALUE, making the measured value SEEM SAFER THAN IT IS in these patients → DRUG HISTORY IS ASKED | DECISIONS ARE NOT MADE BASED ON A SINGLE HIGH VALUE

The need for a shared decision in PSA screening makes adding this test to routine panels inappropriate. In practice, PSA is added to the general check-up package, the patient does not know its meaning, and when the result is high, the chain begins; each link of the chain imposes a burden, and some patients might not have wanted this from the start. The test should be discussed before being requested, and expected lifespan should be considered. Non-cancer causes of elevated PSA must be known: prostate enlargement, prostatitis, urinary tract infection, catheter and interventions, as well as the less known causes of bicycling and recent ejaculation. Some prostate medications lower the value in the opposite direction, misleadingly showing it as safe.

ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE — not absence, but program

EXPLAINING ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE TO THE PATIENT CORRECTLY DIRECTLY DETERMINES THE SUCCESS OF THIS OPTION; IF EXPLAINED INCORRECTLY, THE PATIENT LEAVES THE PROGRAM | PATIENT'S PERSPECTIVE: they have been DIAGNOSED WITH CANCER and their DOCTOR IS NOT STARTING ANY TREATMENT → this is EASILY INTERPRETED as being NEGLECTED or ABANDONED | RESULT: the patient becomes ANXIOUS | THE FAMILY APPLIES PRESSURE | FREQUENTLY SEEKS TREATMENT AT ANOTHER CENTER | HOWEVER, ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE IS NOT AN ABSENCE BUT A PROGRAM: REGULAR INTERVAL PSA MEASUREMENT | EXAMINATION | IMAGING | REPEATED TISSUE SAMPLING | WHEN A SIGN OF DISEASE PROGRESSION IS DETECTED, TREATMENT IS INITIATED | IN OTHER WORDS, THE PATIENT IS NOT UNMONITORED, ON THE CONTRARY, CLOSELY MONITORED | WHEN THIS DISTINCTION IS CLEARLY EXPLAINED and THE SURVEILLANCE SCHEDULE IS GIVEN TO THE PATIENT IN WRITING, ADHERENCE INCREASES SIGNIFICANTLY | RISK STRATIFICATION DETERMINES THE TREATMENT DECISION — two patients with the same diagnosis are MANAGED COMPLETELY DIFFERENTLY IF THEIR RISK GROUPS ARE DIFFERENT, and IF THIS DIFFERENCE IS NOT EXPLAINED, it CREATES CONFUSION: the patient HEARS THAT ANOTHER PROSTATE CANCER PATIENT IN THEIR ENVIRONMENT UNDERWENT SURGERY and ASKS WHY THE SAME THING WAS NOT DONE FOR THEM | INFORMATION USED TOGETHER IN STRATIFICATION: BIOMARKER LEVEL IN BLOOD | EXTENT OF THE TUMOR IN TISSUE EXAMINATION SEEMS AGGRESSIVE | HOW MUCH SPACE THE TUMOR OCCUPIES WITHIN THE PROSTATE | IMAGING FINDINGS | In addition, THE PATIENT ALSO PARTICIPATES IN THE DECISION: AGE, OTHER DISEASES, and PREFERENCE REGARDING SIDE EFFECTS | THE DECISION IS BASED NOT ON A SINGLE NUMBER BUT ON THE WHOLE

Correctly explaining active surveillance determines the success of this option. From the patient's perspective, they have been diagnosed with cancer and no treatment has been started; this is interpreted as neglect, their family puts pressure on them, and they often seek treatment at another center. However, active surveillance is not an absence of action but a program: it includes planned measurements, examinations, imaging, and repeated tissue sampling, and treatment is initiated when progression is detected, meaning the patient is closely monitored. When this distinction is clearly explained and a schedule is provided in writing, adherence increases. Risk classification determines the treatment decision, and if it is not explained, the patient may hear that someone else has had surgery and ask why it was not done for them; the decision is based on the whole, not on a single number.

Hormone therapy burden and spinal cord compression

SIDE EFFECT BURDEN OF HORMONE-SUPPRESSING THERAPY — the area that determines quality of life and is OFTEN NEGLECTED | The treatment works by SUPPRESSING THE MALE HORMONE and this suppression AFFECTS MANY SYSTEMS OF THE BODY | BONE DENSITY DECREASES and FRACTURE RISK INCREASES — THIS PROCESS IS SILENT AND GOES UNNOTICED UNTIL A FRACTURE OCCURS | BODY COMPOSITION CHANGES: MUSCLE MASS DECREASES, FAT INCREASES and SUGAR LEVEL MAY INCREASE | CARDIOVASCULAR RISK INCREASES | HOT FLASHES DISTURB DAILY LIFE, BUT PATIENTS MAY HESITATE TO DESCRIBE IT AS A COMPLAINT THAT IS NOT SPECIFIC TO MEN | LOSS OF SEXUAL FUNCTION and MENTAL EFFECTS are also DIFFICULT TOPICS TO TALK ABOUT | RULE: SIDE EFFECTS ARE ASKED DIRECTLY AND INDIVIDUALLY; EXERCISE IS PLANNED FROM THE BEGINNING WITH BONE PROTECTION | SPINAL CORD COMPRESSION — THE MOST CRITICAL URGENT DECISION THAT PREVENTS PERMANENT DISABILITY: THIS CANCER MOST OFTEN SPREADS TO THE BONE AND ESPECIALLY TO THE SPINE; When a focus in the spine grows, it can COMPRESS THE SPINAL CORD | THE INSIDIOUS SIDE OF THE PROCESS: THE FIRST SYMPTOM IS BACK PAIN and THIS COMPLAINT IS EXTREMELY COMMON IN THIS AGE GROUP → when the patient presents with back pain, A MECHANICAL CAUSE IS CONSIDERED, PAINKILLERS ARE GIVEN and FOLLOW-UP IS RECOMMENDED | HOWEVER, IN A PATIENT WITH KNOWN PROSTATE CANCER, BACK PAIN THAT HAS JUST STARTED OR CHANGED IN NATURE IS HANDLED WITH A DIFFERENT WEIGHT | When WEAKNESS, NUMBNESS IN THE LEGS or URINARY INCONTINENCE are added to the pain, the picture is URGENT: HOURS ARE IMPORTANT AT THIS STAGE BECAUSE NERVE DAMAGE DOES NOT RETURN AFTER A CERTAIN POINT

The burden of side effects of hormone-suppressing therapy determines quality of life and is often neglected. Bone density decreases and this process is silent, not noticeable until a fracture occurs; body composition changes, sugar may rise and cardiovascular risk increases. Hot flashes, loss of sexual function and mental effects are difficult topics to talk about and the patient is hesitant to tell, so they should be asked directly and individually. Spinal cord compression is the most critical emergency decision; The first finding is back pain and is considered mechanical because it is very common in this age group. In known prostate cancer, new or changing back pain should be handled differently; When weakness or urinary incontinence is added, hours count.

Featured external sources

Detailed assessment

Diagnostic and decision reasoning

Clinical framework

Overview

What separates prostate cancer from other cancers is that the main problem is not only late diagnosis but also overdiagnosis and overtreatment. A significant portion of prostate cancers progress so slowly that the patient dies for another reason; when these patients are treated, their lifespan does not increase, but permanent side effects such as urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction occur.

For this reason, two concepts need to be learned. The first is that PSA screening is not an automatic test and requires a shared decision; screening does not benefit patients with limited life expectancy.

The second is active surveillance; it is a valid option in low-risk disease and does not mean leaving the patient untreated, but rather it is an effective program that includes planned measurement and tissue sampling.

Differential diagnosis and assessment

Key considerations

  • Benign prostatic hyperplasia is the most common cause of PSA elevation.
  • Prostate inflammation can cause a significant increase (relevant protocol).
  • Urinary tract infection causes temporary elevation (relevant protocols).
  • Catheterization and urological procedures can affect measurement.
  • Bladder cancer can be confused with urinary symptoms.
  • Other sources of bone metastasis must be distinguished.
  • Mechanical back pain can be confused with bone metastasis.
  • Osteoporotic fractures are in the differential diagnosis (relevant protocol).
  • Neurological diseases should be considered in weakness.
  • Kidney and bladder stones should be considered in urinary symptoms.

Clinical decision reasoning

Why it matters

The points determining the clinical outcome in this disease are related to how it is decided which cancer should be treated and whether the patient understands this decision. The first and fundamental point is the problem of overdiagnosis; the decision is based not on the presence of cancer but on whether that cancer will cause harm.

The second point is that PSA screening requires a shared decision; it starts a chain of tests added to the package. The third point is non-cancer causes that raise the value and, conversely, drugs that lower it.

The fourth point is explaining that active surveillance is a program; if it is not explained, the patient abandons the program. The fifth point is the broad side effect burden of hormone therapy.

The last and most critical point is recognizing spinal cord compression in time.

Safety and monitoring

Complications and safety

Critical complications

  • Urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction develop due to overtreatment.
  • Biopsy can cause bleeding and serious infection.
  • Fracture and pain occur in bone metastases.
  • Spinal cord compression leads to permanent paralysis.
  • Urinary tract obstruction and kidney dysfunction develop.
  • Bone loss and fractures are seen due to hormone-suppressing therapy.
  • Metabolic changes and cardiovascular risk increase.
  • Psychological effects and reduced quality of life occur.

Special patient populations

Special considerations

  • Screening does not benefit patients with limited life expectancy.
  • Screening consultation can be done earlier in those with a family history.
  • Genetic counseling is required in early age, aggressive, or advanced disease.
  • Bone protection should be planned for those receiving hormone-suppressive therapy.
  • Metabolic follow-up should be increased in patients with diabetes and cardiovascular disease.
  • PSA value should be interpreted differently in those using medication for prostate enlargement.
  • The follow-up schedule should be given in writing for patients under active surveillance.
  • Comorbidities in advanced age determine the choice of treatment.

Follow-up and reassessment

Follow-up plan

Prostate cancer surveillance varies according to which management path the patient is on. In a patient under active surveillance, the schedule should be given in writing, and the planned times for measurements, imaging, and tissue sampling should be reminded; it should be checked in every consultation whether the patient understands the program because a patient who does not understand will drop out of surveillance.

In treated patients, urinary incontinence and sexual function problems should be asked directly; these are not reported spontaneously. In those receiving hormone-suppressive therapy, bone health should be monitored, blood sugar and cardiovascular risk factors assessed, and hot flashes and psychological effects should be inquired.

Exercise should be recommended. At every consultation, new bone and back pain should be asked; the patient should be clearly informed that they should apply without delay in case of leg weakness, numbness, or inability to control urine.

Complaints regarding urination and kidney functions should be monitored.

Structured references

  1. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Prostate Cancer ve Prostate Cancer Early Detection. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. — risk sınıflaması, aktif izlem ölçütleri ve erken tanı yaklaşımı. Sürüm ve yıl kurumsal kütüphaneden teyit edilmeli. DOĞRULANMALI
  2. Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2021;79(2):243-262. — tanı, risk grupları ve tedavi seçenekleri. DOĞRULANMALI (tam künye kurumsal kütüphaneden teyit edilmeli)2021
  3. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Prostate Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 2018;319(18):1901-1913. — paylaşılan karar ilkesi ve yaş ölçütleri. DOĞRULANMALI1913
  4. Sanda MG, Cadeddu JA, Kirkby E, et al. Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. J Urol 2018;199(3):683-690. — aktif izlem tanımı ve içeriği. DOĞRULANMALI2018
  5. Saylor PJ, Smith MR. Metabolic complications of androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. J Urol 2013;189(1 Suppl):S34-S42. — hormon baskılayıcı tedavinin metabolik ve kemik etkileri. DOĞRULANMALI2013

Last reviewed: 2026-08-06 · Review due: 2027-08-06

This protocol is intended only as physician bedside DECISION SUPPORT and does not replace independent clinical judgment. PSA THRESHOLD VALUES, SCREENING AGE RANGES, and LIFE EXPECTANCY CRITERIA, BIOPSY CRITERIA, RISK CLASSIFICATION PARAMETERS and GRADING THRESHOLDS, CONTENT AND INTERVALS OF ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE, SURGICAL and RADIATION THERAPY CRITERIA, HORMONAL SUPPRESSION and ADVANCED TREATMENT OPTIONS including ALL DOSES are deliberately not provided; since these vary according to risk group, patient, and center practices, they must be verified from INSTITUTIONAL PROTOCOLS and by UROLOGY and ONCOLOGY. CRITICAL SAFETY: (1) IN THIS DISEASE, OVERDIAGNOSIS and OVERTREATMENT ARE REAL HARM — the decision is based not on 'IS THERE CANCER' but on 'WILL THIS CANCER HARM THIS PATIENT'; (2) PSA IS NOT ADDED TO THE ROUTINE PANEL — it requires SHARED DECISION-MAKING and DOES NOT PROVIDE BENEFIT in patients with LIMITED LIFE EXPECTANCY; (3) DECISIONS ARE NOT MADE BASED ON A SINGLE HIGH VALUE — PROSTATE ENLARGEMENT, PROSTATITIS, INFECTION, PROCEDURES, BICYCLING, and RECENT EJACULATION elevate the value; (4) SOME PROSTATE MEDICATIONS LOWER PSA VALUES and appear FALSELY SAFE — MEDICATION HISTORY should be asked; (5) ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE IS NOT 'LEAVING WITHOUT TREATMENT' — IT IS A PROGRAM that includes PLANNED MONITORING, IMAGING, and REPEATED TISSUE SAMPLING, and a WRITTEN SCHEDULE SHOULD BE PROVIDED; (6) BONE LOSS IN HORMONE SUPPRESSIVE THERAPY IS SILENT and BONE PROTECTION SHOULD BE PLANNED FROM THE BEGINNING; (7) HOT FLASHES, SEXUAL FUNCTION, and PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECTS SHOULD BE ASKED DIRECTLY; (8) IN KNOWN PROSTATE CANCER, NEW or CHANGING BACK PAIN SHOULD BE EVALUATED FOR SPINAL CORD COMPRESSION; WHEN WEAKNESS, NUMBNESS, or URINARY-FECAL INCONTINENCE OCCUR, HOURS ARE CRITICAL; (9) GENETIC COUNSELING MAY BE MEANINGFUL FOR FEMALES IN THE FAMILY. Malignant spinal cord compression, acute bacterial prostatitis, osteoporosis, and hypercalcemia are addressed in separate protocols. Content requires expert manual verification.